Ugandan MP Dennis Ssekabira has fiercely criticized the ruling National Resistance Movement (NRM), accusing the party of weakness and an inability to pass legislation without substantial opposition. During an appearance on Sanyuka Morning Xpress, Ssekabira expressed his concerns about the party’s lack of genuine grassroots support, which he believes is evident in the growing resistance to its legislative agenda. “The National Resistance Movement is weak and lacks real support. Every time it wants to pass a bill, there is resistance, “he said indicating a loss of public trust in the party.
Ssekabira’s comments coincide with a national debate surrounding the Protection of Sovereignty Bill, 2025, a legislative proposal aimed at regulating foreign influence and affirming Uganda’s autonomy across various sectors. The bill has drawn significant attention from political circles and civil society organizations. Proponents, particularly within the NRM Parliamentary Caucus, argue that the legislation is crucial for protecting state institutions and ensuring that national decision-making remains free from external interference. It is expected to impose stricter oversight on foreign financial inflows into the country, requiring organizations and institutions to disclose all foreign funding within 14 days.
The NRM Parliamentary Caucus has formally adopted the government’s proposal to table the legislation, now referred to as the National Sovereignty Bill, 2026. This bill aims to operationalize Article 1, Sub-Article 1 of the Constitution of Uganda, which affirms that all power belongs to the people and must be exercised in accordance with their sovereign will. Government Chief Whip Hamson Obua defended the bill, emphasizing its necessity and alignment with international practice.
However, the proposed legislation has faced criticism. Opponents, including civil society actors, argue that the bill resembles previous attempts to regulate NGOs, particularly regarding foreign funding. Critics claim that the core objectives remain unchanged, tightening control over NGOs and expanding ministerial powers.
Civil society analysts have noted the similarities between past NGO regulatory initiatives and the current bill, including mandatory disclosure of foreign funding and increased oversight by the Ministry of Internal Affairs. This has raised concerns about the potential impact on civic space and organizational independence.
Source: Impulsradio & Television Africa
